Legal Opinion

Stinnett v. Cort Furniture Rental

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 28, 1989No. 84, September Term., 1988PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

The question before us is whether the time for appeal from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission (Commission) runs from the date of the order or from the date of the denial of an unsuccessful motion for a rehearing of the order. We shall hold that Maryland Code (1985 Repl.Vol.), Art. 101, § 56(e) mandates the latter result.

I

The factual context in which the question arises is relatively undisputed. Petitioner Michael L. Stinnett (Stinnett) was employed by respondent Cort Furniture Rental (Cort Furniture). On 16 November 1981, while so employed, he injured his back. He…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Tiller v. ElfenbeinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  3. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. First National Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Hardy v. MettsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Southern Management Corp. v. TahaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Maryland State Police v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane v. TornilloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Frederick County Board of Commissioners v. SautterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Brewer v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API