Legal Opinion

Southern Management Corp. v. Taha

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 25, 2003No. 136, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

In the case now before us, Mukhtar Taha sued Southern Management Corporation (hereinafter “SMC”) and two of its employees for malicious prosecution solely under a theory of respondeat superior liability. The jury rendered a verdict in which it found that the two named employee defendants were not liable; however, the jury also found in favor of Taha against SMC, the employer corporation. We hold that such irreconcilably inconsistent jury verdicts cannot stand under the theory of respondeat superior liability.

I. Background

A. Facts

On May 15, 1994, SMC hired Taha to work as a…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. DiPino v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Okwa v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. MacK v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Serio v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Barclay v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. French v. HinesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. McNeal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API