Legal Opinion

Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane v. Tornillo

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 31, 1990No. 152, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

The question before us is whether a motion for rehearing filed pursuant to Maryland Code (1957, 1985 Repl.Vol.), Article 101, § 56(e) must be preceded by a hearing at which counsel or parties appear and present their adverse positions orally before a member of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission. We shall hold that the subsection embodies no such requirement.

I

Respondent, John Burton Tornillo, claimed that he had sustained an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment by petitioner, Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane. 1 He so alleged in a claim…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Gray Panthers v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  3. Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Ad + Soil, Inc. v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. CBS Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Popham v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Board of Liquor License Commissioners for Baltimore City v. Fells Point Cafe, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane v. TornilloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Miller v. MathiasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Thompson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API