Legal Opinion
State v. Peterson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 27, 1989No. 20, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELDRIDGE, Judge.
The third sentence of Maryland Rule 4-346(c) provides that a revocation of probation hearing “shall be held before the sentencing judge, whenever practicable.” 1 We granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari in this case to decide whether the Court of Special Appeals had misapplied this provision. Although events subsequent to the issuance of a writ of certiorari have rendered the case moot, we shall nevertheless set forth our views concerning the interpretation and application of the third sentence of Rule 4-346(c).
On January 6, 1984, in the Circuit Court for…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- United States v. Clarence E. BraaschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Lloyd v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Reyes v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Coburn v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Suter v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Carroll County Department of Social Services v. EdelmannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- In re Kaela C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.