Schwartz v. Schwartz
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The principal issue presented in this appeal from the judgment below dismissing appellant-plaintiff’s complaint is whether the affirmative defense of res judicata, upon which the dismissal was predicated, was properly before the court. We hold that it was not, and therefore reverse and remand for a new hearing.
THE FACTS
Appellant initiated this action, seeking amounts she claimed were due from respondent, her former husband, under a California decree of divorce entered in 1965 and a subsequent stipulation filed by the parties in Los Angeles Superior Court in 1973, as spousal and child…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Kai Jakobsen v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Mbi Motor Company, Inc. v. Lotus/east, Inc., and Dutchess Auto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Marschall v. City of CarsonNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Choate v. RansomNevada Supreme Court · 1958
- Poe v. La Metropolitana Compania Nacional De Seguros, S.A.Nevada Supreme Court · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by22 opinions
- Terry v. Zions Cooperative Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Res. Grp., LLC v. Nev. Ass'n Servs., Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
- Connell v. Carl's Air ConditioningNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Douglas Disposal, Inc. v. Wee Haul, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Sprouse v. WentzNevada Supreme Court · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.