Maitia v. Allied L. & L. S. Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] There is no such thing in this state as action for mere appointment of receiver; when made, appointment is ancillary to pending action brought by some one authorized to commence it; no private person, stranger, or stockholder can maintain action to dissolve corporation or seize its property. Rev. Laws, 5193; French Bank Case, 53 Cal. 495; State ex rel. Nenzel v. Court,49 Nev. 145.
Dissolution of corporation cannot be had without due notice. Rev. Laws, 5142. As…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mellen v. Moline Malleable Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- La Société Française D'Epargnes et de Prévoyance Mutuelle v. Dist. Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Dist.California Supreme Court · 1879
- Burgess v. HelmNevada Supreme Court · 1898
- Phillips v. WelchNevada Supreme Court · 1876
- Batesville Institute v. KauffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Finley v. FinleyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- Close v. RedeliusNevada Supreme Court · 1950
- Ewing v. SargentNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Petition of FullerNevada Supreme Court · 1945
- Zeigler v. MooreNevada Supreme Court · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.