Legal Opinion

Hedlun v. Holy Terror Mining Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Pennington county. Hon. L,evi McGEE, Judge. Action by John Hedlun against the Holy Terror Mining Company. Application by plaintiff after appeal by defendant for a return of the record to the trial court to correct the bill of exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtHanby, J.

The bill of exceptions in this action was settled and certified July 30, igoo. The appeal was taken August 9th. On September 10th the abstract was served. On November 20th, the case being upon the calendar of this court, it was submitted without oral argument, under rule 21. Appellant’s brief was served January 9, 1901. On March 26, 1901, respondent obtained an order from this court, returnable on April 10th, requiring appellant to show cause why the record should not be returned to the clerk of the circuit court for the purpose of having the bill of exceptions corrected by the trial judge.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coulter v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Spanagel v. DellingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Peart v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Flynn v. CottleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Foley-Wadsworth Implement Co. v. PorteousSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brockman v. UllomNevada Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Wever v. Pioneer Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Jones v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State ex rel. Rearick v. LeggettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API