Legal Opinion
Niagara Fire Insurance Co. v. Nichols
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 20, 1923No. 12010PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
This action was commenced by defendant in error against the plaintiff in error to recover on a fire insurance policy. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and defendant has appealed.
The property of the plaintiff was destroyed by fire on September 3, 1917. The policy contained the following provision:
“No suit or action on this policy, for the recovery of any claim, shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity until after full compliance by the insured with all the foregoing…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hamilton v. Royal Insurance Co. of Liverpool, EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Nance v. Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- George v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Tracy v. Queen City Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Dixon v. State Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States Fire Ins. Co. v. SwydenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- United States Fire Ins. Co. v. WhitchurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Aetna Insurance Co. v. Wewoka Realty & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Importers Exporters Ins. Co. v. FarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.