Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Cottle

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874No. 3,478PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The defendant appealed from the judgment. The other facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Crockett, J.:

The appeal in this case is from the judgment, and was perfected June 18th, 1872. Fifteen days thereafter, the statement on appeal was settled and certified by the Judge, but was not filed in the Clerk’s office until August 31st, 1872. After the transcript on appeal had been filed in this Court, to wit, on October 17th, 1872, the District Judge entered an order revoking and canceling his certificate, reciting in the order that it appeared that the statement as settled was erroneous, and that the certificate was inadvertently made.

The respondent brought up a certified…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Branger & Driard v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baker v. BorelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Benet v. HernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1915
  3. Hedlun v. Holy Terror Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Sprigg v. BarberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Fountain Water Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API