Schwartz v. Milazzo
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The plaintiffs1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, following a hearing in damages, awarding nominal damages in a breach of contract action. They claim that the court incorrectly concluded that the notice of defense filed by the defendant, Samuel Milazzo, satisfied the requirements of our rules of practice. Although we agree, we nevertheless conclude that the court properly determined that the plaintiffs failed to establish their right to further substantial damages.
The relevant facts are as follows. In 1989, the defendant sold a business to the plaintiff Barry…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Issler v. IsslerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Whalen v. IvesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- DeBlasio v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Wren v. MacPherson Interiors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Whitaker v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Lawton v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- ARGENTINIS v. FortunaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Percy v. Lamar Central Outdoor, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.