Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Daley

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1990No. C002365PublishedCited by 10 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, J.

Defendants James H. Daley and Harvey E. Daley (defendants) 1 appeal, and plaintiff Diane M. Wallace cross-appeals, from an interlocutory judgment in an action to partition real property located in Arbuckle. 2 In the interlocutory judgment the court ordered the property sold and the proceeds divided among the parties, the co-owners of the property. Plaintiff was credited with the increase in the property’s value caused by improvements made by plaintiff and her predecessor in interest. Defendants were credited with the value of plaintiff’s exclusive use and occupation of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Willmon v. KoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Ferris v. Montgomery Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Shenson v. ShensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Renner v. Huntington Etc. Oil & Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Ventre v. TiscorniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ankoanda v. Walker-SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. CV1196-18, Pareja v. Cunliffe, Admin for Estate of Chia-Ming Shen and Shi-Ming ShenSuperior Court of Guam · 2020
  3. Colmet-Daage v. Cremoux CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. DeMartini v. DeMartini CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Devine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API