Legal Opinion

Lane v. Hognason

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 12, 1970No. 2 CA-CIV 769PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*332HOWARD, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendants-appellants from (1) a judgment adjudging them to be guilty of forcible detainer, (2) an order of the court denying their motion to vacate or in the al’ternative to amend the judgment and (3) an order denying their motion for a new trial.

' On May 31st, 1966, the appellee, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff and the appellants, hereinafter referred to as the defendants, executed a mining lease and option covering some 31 unpatented mining claims. During the years 1966, 1967 and 1968 defendants did the annual assessment work required…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Holcomb v. LorinoTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. American Bonding & Trust Co. v. Gibson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  4. Johnson v. Simpson Oil CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Phoenix-Sunflower Industries, Inc. v. HughesArizona Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Fulton v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Jenkins v. First Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Lane v. HognasonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Tyler v. Fred Harvey, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API