Legal Opinion

General Battery Corp. v. Gould, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 19, 1982No. Civ. A. 76-162, 77-73PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

This is a consolidated action to determine whether two patents held by Gould, Inc. (“Gould”) are valid and infringed. On May 6, 1976, General Battery Corporation (“GBC”) filed Civil Action No. 76-162 in this Court, seeking a declaratory judgment as to the invalidity and non-infringement of Gould’s product patent, U. S. Letters Patent No. 3,948,680 (“ ’680 patent”). On March 1, 1977, Gould filed Civil Action No. 77-73, alleging that GBC and Northwest Industries, Inc. had infringed the ’680 patent and the subsequently-issued method patent, U. S. Letters…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. New Hampshire Bankers Ass'n v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH v. Dart Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
  2. Friction Division Products, Inc. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
  3. Gable v. National Broadcasting Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
  4. Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. In re NE Opco, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API