Legal Opinion
Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 25, 1983No. Civ. A. 76-800PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment action instituted by plaintiff Railroad Dynamics, Inc. (“RDI”) against A. Stucki Company (“Stucki”) seeking a declaration that United States Patent Number 3,837,292 (hereinafter “the ’292 patent” or the “patent in suit”) is invalid. This Court has jurisdiction over the action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). 1 Stucki, the owner of the patent as- assignee of the inventor, Donald Wiebe, counterclaimed against RDI alleging that the patent was valid and infringed by RDI. RDI has admitted that if…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Owens v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Railroad Dynamics, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. A. Stucki Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Demaco Corporation v. F. Von Langsdorff Licensing Limited and F. Von Langsdorff Bauverfahren GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- A. Stucki Company v. Worthington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Max Daetwyler Corp. v. Input Graphics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- A. Stucki Co. v. SchwamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.