Legal Opinion
Friction Division Products, Inc. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 9, 1987No. Civ. A. 84-218-JRRPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement action filed by plaintiff Friction Division Products (“FDP”) against defendant E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company (“DuPont”). Plaintiff, FDP, charges DuPont with infringing and inducing others to infringe United States Patent No. 4,374,211 (“’211 Patent”). DuPont has denied the allegations of patent infringement and inducement to infringe and has counterclaimed seeking a declaratory judgment that FDP’s patent is invalid, unenforceable and has not been infringed.
Before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Ness v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Titanium Metals Corporation of America v. Donald W. Banner, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In Re Omeprazole Patent LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Oak Industries, Inc. v. Zenith Electronics Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.