Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against King

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 2010No. 200,681-7PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

232 P.3d 1095 (2010)

In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST Paul H. KING, an Attorney at Law.

No. 200,681-7.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued March 3, 2010.

Decided June 10, 2010.

Scott G. Busby, WSBA, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

J.M. JOHNSON, J.

¶ 1 In 2007, the Washington State Bar Association (Association) charged Paul H. King with 10 counts of violating the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC). The hearing officer found that eight counts were proved by a clear preponderance of the evidence due to his representation of a client while suspended from the practice of law and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Stephen Kerr Eugster v. Washington State Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against StarczewskiWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against PlacideWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against ScannellWashington Supreme Court · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API