Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Jackson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2014No. 201,017-2PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.

¶1 After an 11-day disciplinary hearing, a hearing officer concluded that Robert B. Jackson had committed 14 counts of misconduct. The presumptive sanction for 10 of the 14 counts is disbarment. Accordingly, the hearing officer recommended that Jackson be disbarred and a unanimous Washington State Bar Association Disciplinary Board (Board) agreed.

¶2 On appeal, Jackson generally assigns error to all of the hearing officer’s findings of fact but fails to support any assertion with argument, legal authority, or references to the record. We hold that the hearing officer’s credibility…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stephen Kerr Eugster v. Washington State Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. In re Disciplinary Proceeding against AbeleWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API