Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Scannell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 2010No. 200,744-9PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

239 P.3d 332 (2010)

In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST John SCANNELL, (WSBA # 31035), Attorney at Law.

No. 200,744-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 20, 2010.

Decided September 9, 2010.

John R. Scannell, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Scott G. Busby, Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

STEPHENS, J.

¶ 1 In 2005, the Washington State Bar Association (Bar) began investigating grievances against John Scannell in two separate matters. One involved conflicts of interest arising from representing multiple clients and from a business transaction…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against EggerWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against EggerWashington Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re CottinghamWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against JensenWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Beauregard v. Wash. State Bar Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Michael J. Pearce, WSB 7-4838Wyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  5. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against CottinghamWashington Supreme Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API