Legal Opinion

State v. Lovins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 2001No. CF01982; A102866PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He raises two assignments of error. We write only to discuss his second assignment of error, which is that the court erred by denying him the right to make a closing argument. We agree with defendant and reverse and remand for a new trial.

The parties tried the case to the court on stipulated facts that were supplemented by a few witnesses called by each party. Immediately after the last witness testified, the court found defendant guilty. It then briefly discussed sentencing issues with defendant. Defendant asked to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. RogowayOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. DoernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BarajasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Peiffer v. HoytCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. BarajasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. WebsterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API