Legal Opinion

State v. Barajas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 23, 2014No. 09C41316; A151643PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction, contending that, on remand from this court, the trial court erred in denying her request for a jury trial. For the reasons explained below, we agree with defendant. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this case for a new trial before a jury.

In 2009, defendant was charged with various offenses, including delivery of methamphetamine, possession of methamphetamine, and first-degree child neglect. She executed a written waiver of jury trial. Following a bench trial, defendant was convicted of those three offenses. Defendant appealed the resulting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BarajasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Allen v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. LovinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PlueardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. Ambriz-ArguelloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API