Legal Opinion

City of Signal Hill v. Wyse

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1935No. Civ. 10325PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDS, J., pro tem.

This appeal by the defendant in a condemnation action has been taken upon the judgment roll alone. The principal question presented concerns the sufficiency of the findings of the trial court.

The complaint, in which appellant is the sole defendant named, alleged the facts on which the city based its right to take the one parcel of land owned by him upon payment of its value. Appellant in his answer admitted his ownership of the land and alleged it to be of the reasonable value of $10,000. The trial court made a finding “that the total compensation proper to be paid to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bell v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Hambright & Walsh Co. v. Provident Pledge Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Pellegrino v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. California School Employees Ass'n v. King City Union Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Schneider v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API