Legal Opinion

People v. Swain

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1996No. S037138PublishedCited by 182 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

Defendants Jamal K. Swain and David Chatman were each convicted of conspiracy to commit murder and other crimes, stemming from the drive-by shooting death of a 15-year-old boy. As we shall explain, we hold that intent to kill is a required element of the crime of conspiracy to commit murder. In light of the jury instructions given, and general verdicts returned, we cannot determine beyond a reasonable doubt whether the jury found that the defendants conspired with an intent to kill. That conclusion requires us to reverse defendants’ conspiracy convictions.

Facts and Procedural…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. SmitheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People v. Kopp, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. People v. JuradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API