People v. Williams
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
Thirty years ago, we examined the mental state for assault and concluded assault requires only a general criminal intent and not a specific intent to cause injury. (People v. Rocha (1971) 3 Cal.3d 893, 899 [92 Cal.Rptr. 172, 479 P.2d 372] (Rocha).) Seven years ago, we reaffirmed Rocha and reiterated that assault was a general intent crime. (People v. Colantuono (1994) 7 Cal.4th 206, 215-216 [26 Cal.Rptr.2d 908, 865 P.2d 704] (Colantuono).) We further explained that the “mens rea [for assault] is established upon proof the defendant willfully committed an act that by its nature…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by163 opinions
- People v. RundleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Rukhsana Chaudhry v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- People v. ErvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. SamaniegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.