Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2013No. S202790PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

We granted review to decide whether one may conspire to actively participate in a criminal street gang. One can. When an active gang participant possessing the required knowledge and intent agrees with fellow gang members to commit a felony, he has also agreed to commit the gang participation offense. That agreement constitutes conspiracy to commit the offense of active gang participation, and may be separately charged once a conspirator has committed an overt act.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendants Corey Ray Johnson, Joseph Kevin Dixon, and David Lee, Jr., were part of a 200-member…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. AlbillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. People v. PenunuriCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. DaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Riverside County Sheriff's Department v. StiglitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. People v. GuillenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. People v. ScullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API