Legal Opinion

Westerbeck v. Cannon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1940No. 27919PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This is an appeal by defendants R. C. Cannon and wife from a judgment made and entered by the superior court for Skagit county, on November 9, 1938, in an action wherein Adrian Westerbeck and Ida C. Westerbeck, his wife, were plaintiffs, and R. C. Cannon and wife, Harold C. Cannon, Arthur L. Chris-tianson and wife, and C. R. Morgan and wife, were defendants.

The basis of this action, as shown by the complaint, is fraud, which it is alleged was perpetrated upon plaintiffs by defendant R. C. Cannon, while acting as the agent of plaintiffs for the purpose of selling their farm.

It is alleged that,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. NunnWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Breedlove v. HoltonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Gudmundson v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Pickle v. Lincoln County State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hurley v. LindsayWashington Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Spinoso v. Heilman (In Re Heilman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  3. Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau of Olympia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Farrell v. ScoreWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Frisell v. NewmanWashington Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API