Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Lindsay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1919No. 15053PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke county, Mackintosh, J., entered April 3, 1918, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action for damages for fraud, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is an action to recover damages. It is grounded upon alleged false statements made by - and on behalf of defendants Cordelia Lindsay and her husband as to the number of acres in their farm, in*560ducing plaintiffs Hurley and wife to purchase it. Trial in the superior court sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and judgment denying to plaintiffs any recovery, from which they have appealed to this Court. The alleged false statement relied upon by the Hurleys as inducing them to purchase the farm was that it contained twenty acres, when, in fact, it contained but fifteen and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conta v. CorgiatWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Westerbeck v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Weinstein v. SprecherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Rackham v. KochWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Austin v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Haugen v. NeiswongerWashington Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API