Legal Opinion

Gudmundson v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1926No. 19581. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

Respondents, as plaintiffs, brought this action for rescission of a contract to purchase real estate and to recover damages, upon the theory that the contract had been procured by false and fraudulent representations upon which they relied. The cause was tried to the court, a reference was had for an accounting, and a judgment was entered, rescinding the contract and awarding a recovery against both defendants in the sum of $8,516.52, with interest and costs. From that judgment, the defendants have appealed. .

The record is voluminous and greatly involved. Every issue was sharply contested,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Samson v. BealeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Johnson v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Loma Vista Development Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Gnash v. SaariWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Darnell v. NoelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Hopper v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Westerbeck v. CannonWashington Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API