Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Peterson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 27, 2006No. A05-646PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This attorney discipline case arises out of a petition and a supplementary petition filed by the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (OLPR) against respondent Brian J. Peterson alleging numerous violations of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct. We granted the director’s request for temporary suspension based on the alleged misconduct. After a hearing, the referee concluded that Peterson had violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.7(b), 14 Minn.Stat. 1391-92 (2004) (amended June 17, 2005, eff. Oct. 1, 2005) (conflict of interest), Minn. R. Prof. Conduct…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against WentzellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against CrandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against DvorakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against VarrianoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HougeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrigsbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SelmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against WinterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.