Great Northern Oil Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Defendant insurance companies appeal from an order striking a defense from their joint answer.
The issue presented is whether plaintiff-insured, who, prior to a business-interruption loss and by an exculpatory clause in a construction contract, released the contractor from liability for negligently causing the loss, is precluded from pursuing recovery upon a policy of “all-risk” insurance in force prior to the release on the ground that exculpation defeated defendant insurance companies’ subrogation rights against the contractor. We hold that plaintiff is not thereby…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Aetna Life Insurance v. MosesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. MorseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Independent School District No. 877 v. Loberg Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- National Union Fire Insurance Company v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Vogt v. SchroederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Pacific Rent-All, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Westendorf Ex Rel. Westendorf v. StassonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.