Wachtel v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
The complaint contains three causes of action, one against each of the defendants, wherein it is alleged that the plaintiff, the widow of Otto H. Wachtel and the beneficiary of six policies issued by the defendants upon his life, is entitled to double indemnity because of Wachtel's death on August 10, 1930, in consequence of an accident which- occurred on July 10, 1930. The defendants, with the exception of the Manhattan Company, had paid the single indemnity concededly due under the policies. At the conclusion of the entire case the complaint was dismissed and a verdict directed in favor of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Sherri v. National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Rudolph v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scanlan v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Rebenstorf v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
- Breitbart v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944