Legal Opinion

Breitbart v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 29, 1944Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion Per Curiam.

The exclusion of defendant’s letter of July 12, 1943, offered for the purpose of showing waiver of the requirement of the policy that notice be given within a definite period, constituted error (7 Couch’s Cyclopedia of Insurance Law, § 1578; see Concordia Ins. Co. v. School Dist. No. 98, 40 F. 2d 379, affd. 282 U. S. 545). Failure of the plaintiff to allege a waiver is not fatal in the light of defendant’s failure to object to evidence concerning waiver on the ground that it was not within the issues tendered by the pleadings. (Novak v. Melnyk, 224 App. Div. 492, affd. 252…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Concordia Ins. Co. of Milwaukee v. School Dist. No. 98 of Payne Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Wachtel v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. MatthisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Harasymczuk v. Massachusetts Accident Co.New York Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API