Legal Opinion

City of San Diego v. Dunkl

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 2001No. D035559, D035585PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

These two separate declaratory relief actions were brought by the City of San Diego (the City) and the limited partnership which owns the San Diego Padres professional baseball team, Padres, L.P. (the Padres) against two individuals, Michael Kane Dunkl and Philip Zoebisch (collectively referred to as the proponents), who began in November 1999 to circulate a proposed initiative which would have made certain negative findings concerning an earlier city ordinance, Proposition C (Prop. C). Prop. C was adopted by City voters in November 1998 to enable funding and construction of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Housing Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. San Diego City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Robertson v. Health Net of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Padres L.P. v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Glover v. Concerned Citizens for Fuji ParkNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Authority v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API