Legal Opinion
Bradford v. Home Insurance Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 31, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Justice.
Upon cross-motions for summary judgment in Superior Court in Cumberland County the parties joined issue upon the construction which should be given the following language in the homeowner’s insurance policy issued by the Defendant to the Plaintiff:. (T)his company . . . does insure the Insured ... to the extent of the actual cash value of the property at the time of loss, but not exceeding the amount which it would cost to repair or replace the property with material of like kind and quality within a reasonable time after such loss, without allowance for any increased cost of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hewins v. London Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Feinbloom v. Camden Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Midwood Sanatorium v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Firemen's Insurance Co. v. HouleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
- Weinstein v. Commerce InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bering Strait School District v. RLI Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Spears v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Dupre v. Allstate Insurance CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Danzeisen v. Selective Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Reichert v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.