Legal Opinion

Midwood Sanatorium v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 11, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The defendant Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company of San Francisco issued a policy of fire insurance on premises owned by the plaintiff and occupied by it as a sanitarium. The building covered by the policy is a frame structure erected within what is known as a “ fire district ” in the city of New York. Under the ordinances of the city of New York, existing frame buildings erected within such districts are legal, but any existing frame building which may be in need of structural repairs to an amount greater than fifty per cent of its value exclusive of the foundations “ shall not be repaired or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brady v. North Western InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Hewins v. London Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Eliot Five Cents Savings Bank v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Palatine Insurance v. NunnMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Davis v. Grand Rapids Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Feinbloom v. Camden Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Weems v. Service Fire Ins. Co. of New YorkTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  3. A. H. Jacobson Co. v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1949
  4. Bradford v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. Weinstein v. Commerce InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API