Legal Opinion
Feinbloom v. Camden Fire Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 23, 1959PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
54 N.J. Super. 541 (1959)
149 A.2d 616
HARRY FEINBLOOM AND MIRIAM FEINBLOOM, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE CAMDEN FIRE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 5, 1959.
Decided March 23, 1959.
Before Judges PRICE, SCHETTINO and GAULKIN.
Mr. Samuel A. Gennet argued the cause for defendants-appellants and cross-respondents.
Mr. George B. Gelman argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents and cross-appellants (Messrs. Garven, Gelman & Hollander, attorneys).
The opinion of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jardine Estates, Inc. v. Donna Brook Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Hewins v. London Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Apex Metal Stamping Co. v. Alexander & Sawyer, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Rutherford v. Royal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Garrard v. Silver Peak MinesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hughes v. Potomac InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Throgs Neck Bagels, Inc. v. GA InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Wolf v. Home Insurance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Metropolitan Mutual Fire Insurance v. Carmen Holding Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1966
- Stahlberg v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.