Legal Opinion

State v. Wilkes

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 11, 2001No. 3355PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHULER, Judge.

Leroy Wilkes appeals his convictions for assaulting two correctional" facility employees, arguing the indictments did not confer subject matter jurisdiction on the trial court.1 We agree and vacate.

With limited exceptions, “[n]o person may be held to answer for any crime the jurisdiction over which is not within the magistrate’s court, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury of the county where the crime has been committed----” S.C. Const. art. I, § 11; S.C.Code Ann. § 17-19-10 (1985). This provision has been interpreted to mean that, in the absence of an…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Browning v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. State v. BeachumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WilkesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. ReddickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. KnucklesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. ReddickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. WilkesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API