Taylor v. Bell
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The plaintiff seeks hy this action to recover damages for the value of certain personal property alleged to have been converted by the defendant, together with damages for injuries done by the defendant to a building of the plaintiff. It is alleged in the complaint that at a certain date the plaintiff was the owner and in possession of certain real property upon which there was a warehouse, in which was certain personal property belonging to the plaintiff of the value of six hundred dollars, and that on that day the defendant broke into and injured the warehouse, to the damage of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dawson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Kyle v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- De Molera v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Spotts v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Adams v. HelbingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Humphrey v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Porter v. CountsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Dolley v. RagonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- QuiñonesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.