Legal Opinion

Adams v. Helbing

California Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1895No. 15453PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

This is an action of forcible entry and detainer. The plaintiff had judgment, and the defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

It is alleged in the complaint that on the twentieth day of August, 1889, the plaintiff was, and had been for five days previous thereto, the owner and in the actual *300possession of a certain building, situated on the south side of McAllister street, in San Francisco, and known as number 1911 McAllister street, and that on the day named, “ while the plaintiff was in peaceable and actual possession thereof, the defendant unlawfully,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Knight v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Spotts v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. DaltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. De Molera v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hayden v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Blochman v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Clark v. HewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API