Legal Opinion

Good v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 2008No. A117317PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARCHIANO, P. J.

Proposition 69, the DNA Fingerprint, Unsolved Crime and Innocence Protection Act of 2004, substantially expanded the range of persons who must submit DNA samples to the state’s forensic identification databank. The expansion included misdemeanants who must *1499register as sex offenders pursuant to Penal Code former section 290.1 In this case we hold that Proposition 69 requires misdemeanants who must register as sex offenders to provide DNA samples, regardless of whether the conviction triggering the registration requirement occurred before or after the 2004 passage of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Strauss v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. C.B. (In Re C.B.)California Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. Laird, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. VillegasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. MoretCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API