Rodman v. Manning
Oregon Supreme Court
From Lane: Lawrence T. Harris, Judge. This is a suit by Jack Rodman against William P. Manning and Mary Manning, his wife, to enforce the specific performance of a contract to convey certain lands in Lane County, Oregon. From a decree in favor of. plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement by
Mr. Chief Justice Moore.
This is a suit to enforce the specific performance of a contract to convey real property. The facts are that the defendants, William P. Manning and Mary, his wife, were the owners of 320 acres of timber land in.Lane County, Oregon, and while residing at Roy, Washington, received a telegram November 17, 1906, from the plaintiff, Jack Rodman, who, the defendants knew, was engaged in the real estate business at Eugene, inquiring if they owned such property, and, if so, what was the price thereof. Manning, not knowing the value of the land at that time, in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Higgins v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Saladin v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Vinton v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Wolverton v. TuttleOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Kingsley v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oregon Home Builders v. Montgomery Inv. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Doyen v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Greenough v. WillcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Carey v. HumphriesNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Ridgeway v. McGuireOregon Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.