Legal Opinion

Saladin v. Mitchell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1867PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Erastus S. Williams, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Breese

This was an action of assumpsit brought to the Circuit "Court of Cook county, at the March Term, 1866, by John Mitchell against William Saladin, to recover damages for not receiving and paying for 3,000 bushels of barley, parcel of 5,000 bushels, which plaintiff alleged he had, before that time, sold to the defendant at $1.33 per bushel afloat, subject to storage at two cents per bushel.

The plea was non-assumpsit, and a trial had by the court without the intervention of a jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

The record is brought here by writ of error by the defendant, to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bement v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Sands & Crump v. Taylor & LovettNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  3. Bradford v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. John A. Roebling's Sons' Co. v. Lock Stitch Fence Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Murray v. J. M. Doud & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Eau Claire Canning Co. v. Western Brokerage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Thomson v. ThomsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Tribune Co. v. BradshawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API