Handyman Connection of Sacramento, Inc. v. Sands
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
In this case, we construe various provisions of the Contractors’ State License Law related to a contractor’s solicitation and obtaining of a contract to perform work in someone’s home.
In a disciplinary proceeding against plaintiff Handyman Connection of Sacramento, Inc. (Handyman) brought by the Contractors’ State License Board (the Board), an administrative law judge (ALJ) found that Handyman had committed four violations of the Contractors’ State License Law. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 7000 et seq. (the License Law).) The Board adopted the ALJ’s proposed decision and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Benning v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- NILES FREEMAN EQUIPMENT v. JosephCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Patterson Flying Service v. Department of Pesticide RegulationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Ball v. Steadfast-BLKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Owen v. SandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.