Legal Opinion
Patterson Flying Service v. Department of Pesticide Regulation
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 2008No. F052102PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HILL, J.
Appellants appeal from the denial of their petition for writ of administrative mandamus. After a hearing by a hearing officer, the county agricultural commissioner imposed a fine on Patterson Flying Service for failing to follow the label directions when it made an aerial application of pesticides, in violation of Food and Agricultural Code section 12973. An appeal to the Director of the Department of Pesticide Regulation upheld the penalty. Appellants’ petition to the trial court for an administrative writ of mandamus was denied. Appellants appeal that denial, contending the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alford v. PiernoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- California Youth Authority v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Handyman Connection of Sacramento, Inc. v. SandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Modesto City Schools v. Education Audits Appeal PanelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Reilly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Jacobs Farm/Del Cabo, Inc. v. Western Farm Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Fisher v. State Pers. Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Cate v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.