Legal Opinion
Wold v. City of Portland
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff, Harriet Wold, against the City of Portland, a municipal corporation, to recover damages suffered by her through injury to her health, growing out of her employment by the City of Portland in its motor vehicle inspecting station. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendant has appealed.
Chapter 420, Oregon Laws 1935 (§§ 95-3001 and 95-3002, O. C. L. A.), confers upon cities having a popu lation of one hundred thousand or more inhabitants authority to provide by ordinance for periodical inspection of motor vehicles used on the streets of such…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- City of Dallas v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Gebhardt v. Village of Lagrange ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Nicholson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Johnson v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Pearson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Wickman v. Housing AuthorityOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Kiryuta v. Country Preferred InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Wallace M. Telford v. Clackamas County Housing Authority, Ralph Groener, Robert Schumacher, Jono D. HildnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Lasley v. Combined Transport, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.