Legal Opinion

Wickman v. Housing Authority

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1952PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is a damage action for destruction of personal property by fire alleged to have been caused by negligence, brought by Harold J. Wickman, Selma Wick-man, and Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Company, a corporation, as plaintiffs, against Housing Authority of Portland, Oregon, a public corporation, as defendant. A general demurrer to the complaint of plaintiffs was sustained by the trial court, and, plaintiffs refusing to plead further, judgment was entered in favor of defendant, dismissing the action. Plaintiffs appeal.

Omitting formal parts, the complaint alleges:

“I.
“That at all times…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Williamson v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Noonan v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hanson v. MosserOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Landgraver v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity Board, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Clark v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API