Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Board of County Road Commissioners

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1931No. Docket No. 21, Calendar No. 35,254PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff in consequence of his being struck by defendant’s snowplow. At the time of the accident defendant’s snowplow in charge of its employee was being used to remove the snow from trunk line M-26 in Ontonagon county. This work was being done by defendant under contract with the State highway commissioner. Plaintiff had verdict and judgment. Defendant has appealed.

Incident to a motion for directed verdict both at the close of plaintiff’s case and at the close of all the proofs, and also incident to its motion for a new…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Gunther v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Curran v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Longstreet v. County of MecostaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Foss v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Parker v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Thomas v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. McCann v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Smith v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API