Legal Opinion

Wallace M. Telford v. Clackamas County Housing Authority, Ralph Groener, Robert Schumacher, Jono D. Hildner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 14, 1983No. 81-3251PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

This case concerns the validity of an employment contract between Mr. Telford and the former Board of Housing Commissioners for the Clackamas County Housing Authority, and the resulting property interest enjoyed by Mr. Telford. The validity of the contract depends upon whether, under Oregon law, Telford was to perform proprietary or governmental functions. The magistrate held that the contract called for governmental functions, and could not extend beyond the Housing Commissioners’ terms of office.

Reviewing the magistrate’s decision de novo, we find that Telford performed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bank of California, N. A. v. W. H. Opie, California Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. ELDRIDGE v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dewitt v. Western Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Mariano & Assoc., PC v. Board of County Com'rs of Sublette CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Rhode Island Student Loan Authority v. NELS, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
  4. Cunningham v. Anderson CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  5. Dewitt v. Western Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API