Legal Opinion
In Re Pedrosian
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 12, 1932No. Docket No. 70PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARDEN, J., pro tem.
Petitioner is detained by the chief of police of the city of San Bernardino by virtue of a warrant of arrest issued by the police court of said city based upon a complaint filed therein charging him as defendant with the violation of the provisions of Ordinance No. 1456 of said city. The complaint alleges that the defendant has unlawfully engaged in the business of collecting and removing, and that he has unlawfully collected and removed, rubbish from the exclusive zone of said city without having a contract with or consent of the city so to do, at a time when there was in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- California Reduction Co. v. Sanitary Reduction WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- State v. Mountain Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Ex Parte Quong WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Pittam v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Johnston v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Glass v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.