Campbell v. ITE Imperial Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, C.J.
The principal issue in this case is whether the negligence of appellant's employer in failing to warn of or protect appellant from respondent's allegedly unsafe product constitutes an intervening act legally sufficient to operate as a superseding cause? Under the facts of this case, we hold that the employer's negligence does not constitute a superseding cause, and that the trial court *809erred in giving a jury instruction on superseding cause.
I
The facts of this case are largely undisputed. On August 29, 1980, appellant Steve Campbell was working as a wire-man with a crew for Snohomish County…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Maltman v. SauerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Hojem v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Teagle v. Fischer & Porter Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
- Little v. PPG Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Chaussee v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Ethridge v. HwangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- King v. Kayak Manufacturing Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Ethridge v. HwangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.