State v. Bearden
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BERNSTEIN, Justice.
Appellant hereinafter called defendant appeals from a conviction of robbery alleging the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence. In accordance with our rule to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state and resolve all reasonable inferences unfavorably to the defendant, State v. George, 95 Ariz. 366, 368, 390 P.2d 899, we find the facts to be as follows: On September 20, 1963, Salone and McBroom, the latter being defendant’s cousin, entered the Mode O’Day Shop in Phoenix and asked Mrs. Snyder, the owner, if they could see some dresses. Within a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grange v. FinlayWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Henzel v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. TigueArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. GeorgeArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. RiveraArizona Supreme Court · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. HarvillArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.